University at Buffalo - The State University of New York
Skip to Content
The Potential of p38 MAPK Inhibitors to Modulate Periodontal Infections
PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Curr Drug Metab. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 January 24.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2810486
NIHMSID: NIHMS164636

The Potential of p38 MAPK Inhibitors to Modulate Periodontal Infections

Abstract

Periodontal disease initiation and progression occurs as a consequence of the host immune inflammatory response to oral pathogens. The innate and acquired immune systems are critical for the proper immune response. LPS, an outer membrane constituent of periodontal pathogenic bacteria, stimulates the production of inflammatory cytokines IL-β, TNFα, IL-6 and RANKL either directly or indirectly. In LPS-stimulated cells, the induction of cytokine expression requires activation of several signaling pathways including the p38 MAPK pathway. This review will discuss the significance of the p38 MAPK pathway in periodontal disease progression and the potential therapeutic consequences of pharmacological antagonism of this pathway in the treatment of periodontal diseases.

Keywords: Periodontal diseases, p38 MAPK, p38 inhibitors, innate immunity, inflammation, bone loss, cytokine, experimental periodontitis

1. INTRODUCTION

Periodontal disease is a chronic infection of the periodontium, which encompasses both soft and mineralized tissues surrounding the teeth. Periodontal disease progression is associated with chronic inflammation of soft tissues, degradation of collagen fibers that attach the tooth to the gingiva and alveolar bone, as well as resorption of the alveolar bone itself. This can lead to tooth loss and there is some evidence indicating that this chronic infection may have negative systemic effects, including pre-term labor, imbalance of metabolic control in diabetics, complication of lower airway infections and aggravation of atherosclerosis [1, 2].

Since the fundamental role of microorganisms in its etiology was scientifically demonstrated in the mid-60s, the research effort was long focused on identifying the pathogenic microorganisms and their virulence factors [3]. This search for culprit microorganisms was prompted by the fact that colonization of the oral cavity and presence of dental biofilm is normally associated with health, similarly to the colonization of the colon. Various therapeutic strategies aimed at the microorganisms have been studied over the years, including local and systemic delivery of antimicrobial and antibiotic agents. The rationale for these therapeutic approaches is the fact that some species of microorganisms are considered to play prominent roles in periodontal disease based on their increased prevalence in the microbial flora associated diseased states.

Unique to this infection is the reality that the microorganisms associated with initiation and progression of periodontal disease are organized in a biofilm attached to the tooth structure, which places the microorganisms in intimate contact with the soft tissues without effectively invading the host. Even though bacterial invasion has been demonstrated in the periodontal tissues [4], most of the biofilm is located in proximity with the tooth surface, outside of the tissues. This fact significantly impairs the effectiveness of host immune defenses, as well as of therapeutic strategies utilizing antimicrobial chemical agents, to completely erradicate the infection [5].

For the past two decades, the host response to the bacterial challenge originating from the dental biofilm has been considered to play a major role on both initiation of the disease and on the tissue destruction associated with its progress [6]. The importance of host-microbial interactions is reinforced by epidemiological data indicating different susceptibilities to periodontal disease among individuals, in spite of the long-term presence of oral biofilm [7-9]. Other studies demonstrating increased susceptibility and greater severity of periodontal disease in individuals with impaired immune response due to systemic conditions also indicate the significance of the host response to the bacterial challenge [10, 11].

Periodontal diseases provides unique situation to study microbial-host interactions. Over 500 different microbial species can be found in the oral biofilm [12], however only a few of those are associated with periodontal disease [13, 14]. This recognition of pathogenic bacteria by the host is initially mediated by the innate immune response through recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by the Toll-like receptors [15, 16]. Moreover, since the oral cavity as well as other mucosal surfaces, are continuously colonized with non-pathogenic bacteria, there has to be an endogenous negative regulatory mechanism for TLR signaling to prevent an overt host response with deleterious consequences. An example of the consequences of deregulated TLR signaling is Crohn's disease, which is associated with genetic mutations in TLR signaling intermediates [17, 18].

Host response to periodontal infection requires expression of a number of bioactive agents, including pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors and enzymes which are the result of the activation of multiple signaling pathways. This activation of intracellular signaling may initiate exclusively as an innate immune response associated with TLR-mediated sensing of PAMPs. However, the biological mediators expressed as a result of TLR-signaling include co-stimulatory molecules involved in the induction of adaptive immunity [16]. This results in a cascade of events that will establish very complex cytokine and signaling networks.

There is abundant evidence indicating that the adaptive immune response, including humoral and cellular aspects, are fundamentally important in mediating the host response to microorganisms of the oral biofilm and also in tissue destruction associated with periodontal diseases [19-24]. Even though cells participating in the adaptive immune response are considered by some authors to be primary source of cytokines leading to bone resorption [25], there is evidence demonstrating that this may occur in the absence of B and T cells [22, 26, 27].

Innate immunity and inflammation are not synonymous; however inflammation arises primarily in response to infection. To understand how inflammation is initiated in response to microorganisms it is necessary to focus on the primary interactions between these and the host cells, which is carried out by the innate immunity. In this sense, TLR signaling is considered the most important interface between the host and the microbes [16]. Considering that these series of reviews focus on host-microbe interactions and based on the fundamental role played by the innate immune system in these events, we chose to emphasize the role of p38 MAPK signaling pathway in the innate immune response in the initiation of periodontal disease. However, the reader should be aware of the crucial role of the adaptive immune response, induced by innate immunity, to periodontal disease progression.

In this complex scenario of host-microbe interactions involving innate and adaptive responses, the signaling pathways originally shown to be relevant for stress, inflammatory and infectious extracellular stimuli are of special interest to therapeutic manipulation. Ideally, these rather ‘specialized’ pathways that signal stress and inflammatory signals would be selectively modulated to prevent tissue destruction without affecting the host response to prevent dissemination of infection.

In the current paradigm of periodontal disease specific periodontal pathogens are necessary for disease initiation; however, the extent and severity of tissue destruction are largely dependent on the nature of the host-microbial interactions. These interactions are dynamic, since both the microbial composition of the dental biofilm and the competency of host immune responses can vary in the same individual over time. This concept was developed in parallel to the advances on the understanding of the immune response, and research on periodontal disease has been emphasizing mechanisms of host-microbial interactions to understand the disease process, as well as for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Our research group has been investigating the role of p38 MAPK signaling pathway on host-microbial interactions during periodontal disease. This review intends to discuss the significance of the p38 MAPK pathway and the potential to manipulate this pathway for therapeutic applications in vivo.

2. MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF HOST-MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS IN PERIODONTAL DISEASE

Ever since the initial description of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in the mid-late 90s [28], the field of innate immunity has been greatly stimulated and the implications of these receptors on the regulation of host response has been intensively studied. Importantly, the roles of TLRs in inflammation and immune response have been expanded, so it is now known that these receptors not only recognize various microbial-associated molecular patterns to activate innate immune response, but they can also bind to endogenous molecules derived from damaged tissue and have a role in inflammation and adaptive immune response. The TLR family currently consists of more than 13 members, each capable of recognizing different PAMPs. These receptors are expressed by immune cells such as macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells as well as by non-immune resident cells, such as periodontal fibroblasts [29] and gingival epithelial cells [30]. In periodontal tissues, expression of TLR2 and TLR4 has been positively correlated with inflammation [31, 32], as well as in intestinal inflammation [33]. On the other hand, decreased expression of TLR mRNA in the oral mucosa of periodontitis patients has been reported, however concomitantly with increased infiltration of this mucosa with TLR-positive inflammatory cells. This has been regarded by the authors as a possible result of the repeated and prolonged challenge of this tissue with PAMPs and an attempt of the host to reestablish tissue homeostasis, as in an immune tolerance mechanism [34].

TLRs are single-pass transmembrane proteins with an N-terminal presenting leucine-rich repeats that are responsible for the recognition of their ligands and with a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain that is very similar to the cytoplasmic region of the interleukin-1 receptor [35]. Nucleotide-oligomerization domain (Nod) proteins are cytosolic proteins that also have leucine-rich repeats and were initially described as ‘intracellular TLRs’ that recognize PAMPs associated with bacteria invading the cytosol [36, 37]; however these proteins have also been shown to modulate various signaling pathways, including p38 MAPK and NF-κB. Our research group has observed that Nod1 and Nod2 are required for transcriptional activation of RANKL mediated by TLR2 and TLR4 signaling; however only Nod1 is needed for expression of RANKL mRNA induced by IL-1 receptor signaling (unpublished data). This illustrates the complexity of TLR signaling and the cross-talk with other signaling pathways involved since the cytosolic domains of TLRs and IL-1 receptor are similar.

Thus, subsequent to recognition of a ligand by TLRs the signal generated utilizes pathways similar to those utilized by the IL-1 receptor; however TLR signaling was originally described in the context of the activation of IRF family of transcription factors and NF-κB, leading to the expression of interferon-γ and early-response inflammatory genes, respectively. The critical role of TLR receptors in adaptive and immune responses can be used therapeutically to treat infectious diseases, allergies and tumors. Agonists for TLR receptors that enhance innate and adaptive immune responses include ligands of TLR7 (imidazoquinolines) and TLR9 (CpG DNA) that can be used conditions such as basal cell carcinoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, melanoma and allergies [38].

Interestingly, the participation of at least four adaptor proteins containing Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domains that can be recruited by activated TLRs results in important branching of the signal transduction and yields a significant flexibility to TLR signaling by allowing cross-talk with other pathways, including MAP kinase, PKR and Notch patways (Fig. 1). These adaptor proteins are recruited by TLRs by homophilic interactions between their TIR domains and are utilized differently by the TLRs. TLR5, TLR7 and TLR9 were shown to depend on recruitment of MyD88 to signal [39, 40], whereas TLR3 is the only TLR that does not use MyD88 [41]. TLR4, on the other hand, can use all four adaptor proteins: MyD88, TRIF, Mal/TIRAP and TRAM [41-43]. Even though activation of the canonical NF-κB pathway is usually effected by all TLRs, the timing of NF-κB activation [44, 45] as well as the additional signaling pathways that are activated by the branching of the signal varies among TLR receptors and with the participation of different adaptor proteins. These variations will ultimately affect the biological result in terms of gene expression and can provide opportunities for therapeutic manipulation of signaling by some of the pathways activated by cross-talk. This is demonstrated by the finding that even though NF-κB activation is observed after TLR4 stimulation by LPS, this may or may not result in inflammatory gene expression depending on the adaptor protein used. In wild-type cells, LPS stimulation results in inflammatory cytokine expression, whereas in MyD88-deficient cells LPS fails to induce cytokine expression. In the absence of MyD88, activation of NF-κB occurs with delayed kinetics in comparison to wild-type cells [44]. This delayed activation of NF-κB is dependent on TRIF, and interestingly both pathways involve activation of TRAF6/TAK1 which are common upstream activators of other signaling pathways such as MAP kinases.

The shift on the microbial population present in the oral biofilm from predominantly Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria that is associated with the onset of periodontal disease may lead to different patterns of immune response as a result of the type of TLR predominantly activated. Gram-positive bacteria were shown to activate TLR2, which induced increased expression of IL-8, whereas Gram-negative bacteria activated predominantly TLR4, resulting in increased expression of TNF-α [46].

However, some Gram-negative microorganisms that are present in the oral biofilm and associated with periodontal disease are rather unique in their capacity to activate NF-κB via preferential utilization of TLR2 [47]. Recently, it was reported that most Gram-negative bacteria associated with periodontal disease, including Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythensis, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescences, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Veillonella parvula are all capable of activating TLR2, whereas the latter two microorganisms cam also activate TLR4 [48]. Even though all these disease-associated microorganisms activate TLR2 signaling, this pathway can also be activated in vitro by microorganisms present in an oral biofilm composed primarily by Gram-positive bacteria, and which are common colonizers of the oral biofilm and not associated with clinical signs of periodontal disease [49]. The fact that TLR2 is activated by both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms is an interesting finding and suggests differences on the utilization of adaptor proteins and/or concomitant activation of other TLRs by different PAMPs expressed by the various bacterial species that are present in an oral biofilm associated with disease. These differences can lead to the activation of different signaling pathways and subsequent modulation of the host response. It is important to bear in mind the complexity of the oral biofilm, which may include over 500 different microbial species and, consequently, a multitude of PAMPs that can activate various TLRs. The rationale for therapeutic manipulation of signaling pathways that are relevant for expression of genes associated with tissue destruction and disease progression is actually strengthened by this enormous variability of microbial species and PAMPs in the dental biofilm, since an antimicrobial approach is extremely complicated not only by the variability of species but also due to the organization of these microorganisms in a biofilm.

Modulation of TLR signaling by endogenous mechanisms for negative modulation of TLR signaling evolved with the immune system initially in areas of interactions between the host and nonpathogenic microbes [16]. This contact with commensal bacteria through mucosal surfaces is believed to be important during post-natal development, however the local and systemic immune responses are downregulated and reprogrammed by tolerance mechanisms [50, 51]. This immune tolerance towards commensal microorganisms combined to adequate responsiveness to pathogens is essential to maintain immune homeostasis while preventing life-threatening infections. Especifically in the oral mucosa, it is not clear how the immune system is able to quickly distinguish between commensal and pathogenic bacteria and tailor the host response [34]. This type of response is observed in intestinal cells which downregulate expression of TLR and adaptor proteins to limit LPS signaling [52], which has also been shown in macrophages [53]. Other mechanisms of tolerance may not involve TLR expression directly, but rather the downstream signaling pathways [54].

This negative regulation can occur by two main mechanisms: 1) cessation of the signal by the clearing/removal of the ligands, and 2) prevention of further signaling. The first mechanism is associated with the resolution of an infection, which results in the removal and clearing of all microbial-associated molecular patterns and, consequently, cessation of TLR signaling. The second mechanism encompasses various endogenous regulatory strategies that interfere with signaling, including receptor expression/degradation, sequestration of adaptor proteins and other signaling intermediates by other proteins that either target these for degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome or block the kinase activity of the signaling intermediates. These strategies will prevent further downstream signaling and may be somewhat specific for some of the signaling pathways activated downstream of TLR signaling.

Therapeutic manipulation involving inhibition of TLR signaling can be beneficial in autoimmune conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that are associated with enhanced production of type I interferon. Other applications of TLR inhibitors include inflammatory diseases and prevention of septic shock. Indeed, a small molecule inhibitor TAK-242 was discovered as a new therapeutic agent for sepsis, and it was shown to function by inhibiting TLR4-specific TRAM-TRIF mediated pathway. Inhibition of this pathway prevents MAP kinase activation and, consequently, pro-inflammatory cytokine production upon stimulation by LPS [55]. In spite of its potential as therapeutic targets to modulate hostmicrobial interactions, inhibition of TLR signaling implicates in decreased efficacy of innate immune response with the associated risks to the host in infectious diseases.

3. SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN PERIODONTAL PATHOGEN-INDUCED INFLAMMATION

The hallmark of destructive periodontal disease is the overproduction of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators, which is similar to other chronic inflammatory diseases, including conditions of non-infectious origin such as rheumatoid arthritis [6]. Production of cytokines and inflammatory mediators is usually a tightly-controlled process which is always initiated by external stimuli, or ‘signals’ that are rapidly transduced through the cytoplasm and into the nucleus where gene expression starts with the transcription of DNA into pre-mRNA. From this very start to the final assembly of the biologically-active protein, there are a great number of regulatory mechanisms that can affect gene expression and various signaling pathways can participate in many of these mechanisms, both at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels.

The MAP kinases are a group of conserved cytoplasmic kinases that are organized in modules (MAPKKKAn external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-164636-ig0002.jpgMAPKKAn external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-164636-ig0003.jpgMAPK) sequentially activated by dual phosphorylation at Tyrosine/Threonine residues. Of the four distinct classes of MAP kinases described to date in mammals, p38 (α, β, γ and δ isoforms), c-Jun N-terminal activated kinases (JNK1-3) and extracellular activated kinases (ERK1,2) are the most studied. Downstream substrates of MAP kinases include a variety of transcription factors, RNA-binding proteins and other kinases (MAPKAPK - mitogen activated protein kinase-activated protein kinases) that are involved in regulation of gene expression by transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational and post-translational mechanisms. This implies that therapeutic modulation of signaling pathways can affect various genes, depending not only on the pathway but also on the relative position targeted for inhibition in the signaling cascade.

Interestingly, the proteins comprising many of the signaling pathways are much conserved among different species of organisms indicating their fundamental role in many essential physiological processes. Some of these signaling pathways have also a relevant role in diverse pathological conditions, demonstrating their multivalency. For instance, the p38 MAPK pathway was originally described as critically important to signal stress, inflammatory and infectious stimuli; but it is also involved in the control of fundamental processes including cell proliferation [56], differentiation [57] and migration [58]. Nevertheless, many reports indicate its relevance and/or potential therapeutic application in disease processes that involves inflammation and immunity, including rheumatoid arthritis [59-61], ischemic heart disease [62], allergies [63, 64], chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases [65], Alzheimer's disease [66] and cancer [67].

Surprisingly, in spite of evidence indicating a role of p38 MAPK in all these diseases, there is a relative paucity of information regarding its role in oral inflammation-related conditions including temporo-mandibular joint disorders, chronic oral pain and inflammatory changes of the oral mucosa [68]. Interest in its role in chronic inflammatory periodontal diseases has occurred only in the past few years. Our lab group has shown the relevance of p38 MAPK for the regulation of expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enzymes induced by inflammatory and infectious signals in vitro, including IL-6 [69, 70], MMP-13 [29, 71] and RANKL [72] in periodontally-relevant resident cells, such as fibroblasts and osteoblasts. This information obtained in vitro was also tested in in vivo models of periodontal disease and other inflammation-associated diseases, as discussed later in this review (Table 1).

Table 1
Summary of In Vivo Studies Using p38 MAPK Inhibitors and their Results in Terms of Cytokine Gene Regulation

Specifically in periodontal disease, in spite of a great deal of information available on the regulation and expression of inflammatory cytokines, there are only a few reports on the signaling pathways activated in vivo. Nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) has been shown to be associated with increased periodontal disease severity [73]. Our research group has found interesting differences on the activation of signaling pathways in two frequently used murine models of experimentally-induced periodontal disease. In both the LPS injection model and the ligature model p38 and ERK MAP kinases, as well as NF-κB was activated, but with different kinetics. On the other hand, activation of JAK-STAT signaling was only observed with the ligature model (unpublished data). The cytokine profile associated with periodontal disease in vivo varies and includes both Th1- and Th2-type responses. IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-8 and TNF-α mRNA were detected in macrophages present in inflamed gingival tissues [74], whereas Th-2 cytokine IL-4 and pleiotropic IL-6 protein were also observed in diseased periodontal tissues [75]. A characteristic cytokine profile has been associated with each type of periodontal disease, i.e. inflammation of marginal soft tissues without active bone resorption (gingivitis) or with active bone resorption (periodontitis). Thus, expression of Th1-type cytokines has been associated with gingivitis, whereas Th2 cytokines were found in higher levels on periodontitis-affected tissues [76, 77], even though this distinction was not clear-cut with both Th1 and Th2 cytokines being produced in gingivitis- and periodontitis-affected tissues and the predominant profile may actually represent the current activity of tissue destruction [78-80].

The pivotal role of TLR signaling, and that of the innate immune response, in the initiation of periodontal disease is supported by recent findings demonstrating a positive correlation between clinical parameters of gingivitis and periodontitis and TLR4 stimulating ability of supragingival plaque microorganisms [49]. According to current paradigm of periodontal diseases, formation of supragingival plaque is required for initiation of marginal inflammation and subsequent maturation and formation of subgingival plaque [13, 81]. Most bacteria from subgingival plaque, on the other hand, have been shown to predominantly stimulate TLR2 with only A. actinomycetemcomitans and V. parvula stimulating TLR4 [48]. This differential activation of TLR signaling pathways by different bacteria in the oral biofilm can influence the production of cytokines, e.g. stimulation of human whole blood cells with Gram-positive bacteria increased the expression of IL-8, whereas Gram-negative bacteria induced the expression of TNF-α [46]. This may also be relevant in the establishment of a Th1 or Th2 type of host response.

Based on these cytokine profiles, it is expected that p38 MAP kinase shall play a relevant role in disease progression, since this signaling pathway is not only one of the main downstream effectors of TLR signaling [15, 16], but is also particularly relevant for the activation and development of adaptive immune responses, as demonstrated by its role on T-cell proliferation and cytokine production [82, 83] and differentiation of immature T cells into Th1 or Th2 effector cells [84]. p38 MAPK is also involved in B-cell activation [85] and production of cytokines, including IL-10 [86] and even modulates IL-4-mediated responses in B cells by cross-talk with STAT6 [87]. This illustrates the multiple roles of this signaling pathway and how modulation of its activity may have multiple effects both on innate and adaptive immunity. Other signaling pathways that have been shown to be activated and involved in regulation of gene expression during inflammation and immune response such as Notch [88, 89], Wnt [90, 91] and PI3-kinase [92, 93] pathways participate in host-microbe interactions, but have not been studied in the context of periodontal disease.

Since the cytokine network established in diseased periodontal tissues is very complex and may be subject to shifts depending on disease activity [94], and also due to the redundant and overlapping role of many cytokines, understanding the signaling pathways involved in cytokine gene expression may provide and alternative approach for the modulation of host response affecting the whole cytokine profile.

4. p38 MAPK—KEY TO INNATE IMMUNE RESPONSE THROUGH POSTTRANSCRIPTIONAL GENE REGULATION

Cells of the immune system keep rigid control over the production of potentially harmful cytokines by repressing their expression at the post-transcriptional level. The adenine and uridine (AU)-rich elements (ARE), located in the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of many cytokines (e.g. GM-CSF, TNFα, IL-2, IL-3, IL-6) and other proinflammatory factors (e.g. COX-2 and MMP-13), plays a major role in post-transcriptional repression. The presence of an ARE in a particular transcript can target it for rapid degradation or inhibit translation.

Inflammatory stimuli (LPS, IL-1β, or TNFα) dictate mRNA stability through signaling mechanisms. In the presence of inflammatory stimuli, AREs from 3’ UTRs of IL-6, IL-8, COX-2, and TNF-α mediate regulation of mRNA stability by p38 MAPK [70, 95-100]. p38 MAPK is phosphorylated and activated by upstream kinases MKK3 and MKK6 when stimulated by IL-1β, TNF-α or LPS [101]. p38 MAPK then phosphorylates MK2 [102] which phosphorylates RNA binding proteins to control mRNA stability [95, 97, 103].

Ramifications of Blocking/Antagonizing p38 Signaling

Manipulation of signaling pathways is potentially very promising for therapeutic applications in periodontal diseases because it can affect the expression of many cytokines, resulting in a more comprehensive and thorough change in the cytokine network established by the host response to the microbial aggression. Considering the association of p38 MAPK pathway with signaling of stress and inflammatory/infectious stimuli, we have focused on studying the potential of modulating this pathway to affect the expression of some pro-inflammatory cytokines that are especially relevant for host-mediated degradation of mineralized and non-mineralized tissues in periodontal disease.

In vitro evidence for the relevance of p38 MAPK to periodontal disease is primarily derived from studies demonstrating the important role of this signaling pathway to the regulation of expression of inflammatory cytokines that are relevant to the disease process. The cytokines directly or indirectly regulated by p38 MAPK include IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF-α, NO, PGE2, MMP-13, RANKL in various cell types associated with innate and adaptive immune responses [59, 84, 104-107]. This role of p38 on regulation of relevant cytokines has been demonstrated also for resident periodontal cells, especially gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblasts [29, 69-71, 108]. The fact that p38 MAPK regulates the expression of various inflammatory mediators is especially important for therapeutic applications if one considers that targeting expression of a single cytokine may not be effective due to compensation of its biological role by other pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, a significant challenge for this approach is represented by two characteristics of signaling pathways: 1) branching, which allows the establishment of complex signaling networks, because a given signaling intermediate can be activated by different upstream activators, and this same intermediate signaling protein can also activate different downstream effectors; and 2) multivalency, which refers to the diversity of effects a given signaling pathway may have on cell biology, depending on the nature of external stimulation, duration and intensity of stimulation, cell type and differentiation status.

The branching of signaling pathways allows for multiple regulation points along the pathway and can compensate a decrease in activity of other signaling pathways trough cross-talk. Thus, depending on the level targeted for modulation in a given signaling pathway, inhibition of a given signaling pathway may have unwanted effects on the activity of other signaling pathways and consequently on the cytokine network. For instance, targeted inhibition of upstream MAP3Ks, such as MEK1, 2 or 3 individually result in completely different patterns of gene expression in spite of the fact that these kinases are all upstream activators of JNK MAPkinase [109]. However, MEK3 is also an upstream activator of p38 MAPK. We have observed cross-talk between ERK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in fibroblasts even when targeting p38 MAPK, which is downstream in the signaling pathways [71]. Interestingly, we observed that the p38 MAPK has opposite effects on the regulation of the same gene (MMP-13) depending on the nature of the external stimulation (inflammatory cytokines or bacterial LPS) [29, 71]. This type of in vitro data suggests that in a situation such as periodontal disease in which multiple external stimuli are present, a network of activated signaling pathways is established and the role of each signaling pathway has to be studied and understood in the context of each cell type and disease model, but it should also be confirmed in in vivo models.

The multivalency of signaling pathways also poses a challenge to their therapeutic manipulation because it may not only affect expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, but also expression of essential genes and bioactive molecules associated with cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. p38 MAPK can be activated by signaling through different receptors, including G-protein-coupled receptors, growth factor receptors, cytokine receptors and Toll-like receptors, which demonstrates the multivalency of this pathway to modulate cell response to a host of extracellular environmental cues by regulation of various genes and cell biology aspects. The fact that p38 is activated by different receptors implicate that various upstream activators are involved in the transduction of the signal, including ASK1, MLK3, MEKK2-4, Tpl2 and TBK1 [110]. These kinases, in turn, are activated by different stimuli in various cell types, and they activate multiple signaling pathways besides p38 MAPK. Targetting these upstream kinases, although still viable for immuno-modulatory purposes, may result in unwanted side-effects because it would also affect other signaling pathways activated downstream. In fact, these negative effects may occur even when modulation of signaling is targeted to occur on downstream mediators of the pathway, such as p38 MAPK itself, either by negative or positive feedback and cross-talk mechanisms.

The difficulties associated with branching and multivalency of p38 MAPK pathway are observed in vitro, but may be significantly amplified in vivo because of the participation of multiple cell types, which can have different patterns of expression of the upstream activators MAP3Ks or their targets [111]. Various cell types can also utilize the same signaling pathways in a distinct manner due to variability on expression of specific genes, on differential transcription profile, on alternative splicing of signaling proteins and on the pattern of expression of different isoforms of signaling proteins. Notably, even in the same cell type p38 MAPK can have opposite effects on the expression of the same gene, depending on the nature of the external stimulation that induced activation of this pathway. We have shown in fibroblasts that p38 MAPK has a negative regulatory effect on cytokine-induced MMP-13 expression [71], whereas in the same cells p38 had a positive regulatory effect on LPS-induced MMP-13 expression [29]. This antagonistic effect of p38 MAPK by signaling through cytokine and TLR receptors may be associated with differential activation and utilization of upstream activators of p38 MAPK, such as MKK3 and MKK6 and subsequently preferential activation of some isoforms of p38 MAPK by either upstream MAP2K. It also has to be considered that p38 may be involved in different gene regulation mechanisms, including transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechan isms. We have shown that p38 regulates cytokine-induced IL-6 at the level of mRNA stability involving multiple AU-rich elements in the 3’UTR region [70, 112], whereas this signaling pathway regulates cytokine-induced RANKL [72] and LPS-induced MMP-13 [29] by transcriptional mechanisms.

The list of known substrates of p38 MAPK increases frequently and includes many transcription factors (ATF2 [113], ATF1 [114], Sap1 [115], p53 [116], C/EBPβ [117], STAT1 [118], Elk-1 [119], Pax6 [120]), other protein kinases (MK2 [121], MK3 [122], MNK1 [123], MSK [124], PRAK [125]) and protein substrates (cPLA2 [126], EGFR [127], Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL [128], TTP [129, 130]). This adds to the complexity of the implications of inhibiting p38 MAPK, which may modulate regulation of gene expression by transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational [131] mechanisms.

Moreover, the recognition of four isoforms of p38 MAPK (α, β, γ and δ) which share only 60% sequence identity with one another suggests that selective activation of these isoforms may occur in specific cell types in response to the combinations of upstream activators. MKK3 and MKK6 were shown to activate p38α/γ/δ, whereas p38β is preferentially activated by MKK6 [101]. Interestingly, in contrast to α and β isoforms, p38γ and p38δ are not sensible to inhibition by pyridinyl imidazole compounds, and there is some evidence for distinct roles for these isoforms. For example, a specific role for p38δ in human keratinocyte differentiation has been shown [132], and the substrate specificities of the isoform are also different, since p38α/β are capable of phosphorylating MK2; whereas p38γ/δ are not. The functional role of p38γ/δ is still largely unknown, and even though not fully characterized, mice lacking expression of these isoforms are viable, fertile and do not have an obvious phenotype [133].

4. SIGNIFICANCE OF IN VIVO BLOCKAGE OF P38 MAPK SIGNALING IN PERIODONTAL DISEASE PROGRESSION

The current concept of periodontal therapy focuses on eliminating bacteria through mechanical means and chemotherapeutics. However, none of these methods has proven universally efficacious, particularly in the case of tissue-invasive species like A. actinomycetemcomitans [134]. Thus, the concept of host modulation has garnered much attention in periodontal research over the past decade.

Many host modulatory therapies have been implemented to target the host defenses in periodontal infections. Multiple studies have shown significant clinical improvement and reduction of alveolar bone destruction by modulating arachidonic acid metabolites [135-137] and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [138, 139]. Successful attempts have been made to alter osteoclast activity through bisphosphonates [140, 141] and a novel vacuolar ATPase [142]. However, these therapies target singular mechanisms of alveolar bone destruction.

One of the attractive features of modulating p38 MAPK signaling is that this molecular target is an ‘upstream’ common signaling intermediate to many inflammatory cytokines. Activated monocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts in the periodontium produce cytokines and prostanoids, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and prostaglandin E2 [143]. These cytokines then induce the production of other inflammatory mediators, such as MMPs, prostaglandins, and RANKL that ultimately lead to osteoclastogenesis and tissue destruction [144, 145]. Recent evidence reveals that C5a-potentiated IL-6 and TNF-α production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells is inhibited by the p38 inhibitor [146]. Thus, blockade of p38 MAPK could affect inflammation at multiple levels in the immune response.

Several monocytokine-suppressive therapies have gained Federal Drug Administration approval and are currently available. These include the IL-1 inhibitor anakinra (Kineret®; Amgen) and the TNF-α inhibitors adalimumab (Humira®; Abbott), etanercept (Enbrel®, Wyeth) and infliximab (Remicade®, Centocor). These drugs are intended for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and ankylosing spondilitis. To date, none have been approved for the treatment of periodontitis. Despite marked clinical improvements and apparent effectiveness of these drugs, there is still a need for improvement. Thus combination therapy may be more efficacious [147]. This may be because cytokines often act synergistically, as with IL-1 and TNF-α. It has been shown that simultaneous blockage of these cytokines is substantially more effective than blocking only one [148]. Consider the first human trial in which a single dose of p38 inhibitor decreased TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 levels by 90% [149].

However, pan-cytokine blockade does pose potential problems since osteoclastogenesis is required for physiological bone turnover and remodeling. In one study, an orally active p38 inhibitor had a slight anabolic effect as shown by quantitative micro computed tomography [150]. These data suggest that p38 inhibitors have a relatively high suppression of osteoclastogenesis without compensatory shut-off of osteoblastic differentiation. However, it is not believed that osteoclastogenesis is completely eliminated by p38 inhibition. Systemically, a number of hormones and cytokines modulate osteoclastogenesis: parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcitriol, PTH-related protein (PTHrP), PGE2, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-11 [6]. Of these, PTH and PTHrP can still activate osteoclastogenesis independently of p38 signaling [151]. Conceptually, this makes p38 inhibitor strategies appealing as a host modulating agent for treatment of periodontitis as physiological bone turnover (induced by PTH/PTHrP) would occur, but inflammatory bone loss (induced by LPS, IL-1β, TNFα) would be pharmacologically antagonized.

On another cautionary note, potent cytokine blockade could lead to an immunocompromised host. For example, known side effects of TNF-α inhibitors include reactivation of tuberculosis, infection with opportunistic infections, lymphoma, lupus-like syndrome, injection site reactions, rashes and nephritic syndrome [152, 153]. p38 MAPK has several known roles within the immune system. It is required for CD40-induced gene expression and proliferation in B lymphocytes [85, 154]. It has also been shown to induce apoptosis of CD8+ T cells and induce T-helper 1 (Th1) differentiation and interferon-γ production by CD4+ T cells [82, 155]. Thus, it is possible that suppression of these activities could lead to a depressed immune response.

However, the p38 MAPK isoforms have varying sensitivities to p38 inhibitors. In vitro assays using early forms of inhibitors (SB203580 and SB202190) demonstrated that only p38α and p38β are blocked; p38γ and p38δ remain unaffected [156, 157]. Furthermore, the isoforms are variously expressed throughout the body, although they can all be expressed in a tissue given the appropriate stimulus [158]. Isoform α is ubiquitious, β is expressed largely in the brain and heart, δ is found in muscle, and γ is mostly in the lung, kidney, gut, and salivary gland epithelium [159]. While p38 MAPK as a whole is associated with the stress response, each isoform has a specific and different action. For example, α induces apoptosis of while β protects cardiac muscle cells [160]. Therefore, p38 MAPK inhibition does not necessarily block all functions of p38 MAPK.

Because p38α is the isoform most highly implicated in inflammation, p38α-selective inhibitors are ideal. SD-282, the inhibitor we used in one of our studies [150] is 14.3-fold more selective for p38α than for p38β [161]. This confers strong anti-inflammatory action, including blockage of osteolysis, as demonstrated in rats in both rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis models [59, 162].

FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS

Because p38α is the isoform most highly implicated in inflammation, p38α-selective inhibitors are ideal. Currently, p38 MAPK inhibitors are in development by Boehringer Ingelheim (BIRB 796), Glaxo-SmithKline (GSK 681323 and 856553), Pfizer (CP-690550 and PH-797804), Roche (R1503), Scios (SCIO-469) and Vertex (VX-702). Most of these drugs are in the midst of clinical trials. For example, VX-702 has been in phase II trials since 2005, and as of late 2006, the company planned to file an investigational new drug (IND) application [163]. Pfizer has several multi-national centers actively recruiting patients for phase II trials of it PH-797804.

Reported adverse effects of p38 inhibitors include dizziness, gastrointestinal disturbances, and hepatotoxicity (i.e. cytochrome p450 interaction) [164]. Testing in dog models revealed adverse neurological effects with high-dose first-generation VX-745, although no such effects were reported in humans [165]. Subsequent modification resulted in a drug (VX-702) that was incapable of crossing the blood-brain barrier. Fortunately, adverse events seem rare. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 284 patients reported no difference in side effects between 10, 20, 30, or 60 mg of BIRB 796 given twice daily for 8 weeks versus placebo [166].

As is the case with any new therapeutic, further clinical research with more patients and longer follow-up is needed to determine the safety and efficacy before it can be utilized on a widespread basis. Future pharmacologic efforts may focus on alternative approaches such as targeting other molecules in the p38 MAPK pathway (such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases) or increasing inhibitor selectivity by avoiding ATP binding competition [167].

p38 inhibition is an appealing approach across many aspects of medicine. Although it has been investigated heavily for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, it has also been associated with a plethora of disease such as diabetes, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and even avian influenza [164, 168-170]. In the dental field alone, the p38 MAPK pathway is linked to periodontitis, mucositis, chronic ulcerative stomatitis, desquamative gingivitis, pemphigus vulgaris, and temporomandibular joint disorder [171]. As understanding of this pathway grows, so too will its potential applications and the opportunity to improve the lifespan and quality of life for millions of patients (Table 1).

Periodontal disease and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have remarkably similar inflammatory mediator profiles [172-174]. A variety of immune-associated cell populations are responsible for the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases. Within periodontal lesions, activated monocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts all produce cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, PGE2, and IL-6 and have all been found to be significantly elevated in diseased periodontal sites compared to healthy or inactive sites [143, 175, 176]. These cytokines orchestrate the cascade of destructive events that occur in the periodontal tissues, and trigger the production of an array of inflammatory enzymes and mediators including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), prostaglandins, and osteoclasts, thus resulting in irreversible hard and soft tissue damage [144, 177]. Due to the similarity of pathogenesis between periodontitis and RA, p38 inhibitors have the potential to effectively manage periodontal disease progression.

Our data using an experimental rat model of alveolar bone loss clearly indicates that inhibiting p38 MAPK has a protective effect on inflammatory alveolar bone loss (see Fig. 2). Previous data from our laboratory has established that the p38 isoform is clearly required for MMP-13, IL-6 and RANKL expression in periodontally relevant cell types including osteoblasts and periodontal ligament fibroblasts [69-72]. In vivo, phosphorylated levels of p38 were extremely high experimental periodontal tissues. Recently, we have been able to demonstrate that phosphorylated levels of p38 are higher in diseased periodontal tissues compared to age-matched healthy control tissues (unpublished data).

In summary, the role of p38 inhibitors to have potential beneficial effects in LPS-induced alveolar bone loss. Although p38 inhibitors should be evaluated in infectious periodontal disease models, these data suggest that use of these agents may be considered as novel host modulatory agents in the treatment and management of human chronic periodontitis.

REFERENCES

1. Seymour GJ, Ford PJ, Cullinan MP, Leishman S, Yamazaki K. Relationship between periodontal infections and systemic disease. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(Suppl 4):3–10. [PubMed]
2. Bahekar AA, Singh S, Saha S, Molnar J, Arora R. The prevalence and incidence of coronary heart disease is significantly increased in periodontitis: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2007;154(5):830–837. [PubMed]
3. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD. Evidence of bacterial etiology: a historical perspective. Periodontol 2000. 1994;5:7–25. [PubMed]
4. Lamont RJ, Yilmaz O. In or out: the invasiveness of oral bacteria. Periodontol 2000. 2002;30:61–69. [PubMed]
5. Hanes PJ, Purvis JP. Local anti-infective therapy: pharmacological agents. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003;8(1):79–98. [PubMed]
6. Kirkwood KL, Cirelli J, Rogers JE, Giannobile WV. Novel host response therapeutic approaches to treat periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2007;41:1–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Loe H, Anerud A, Boysen H, Morrison E. Natural history of periodontal disease in man. Rapid, moderate and no loss of attachment in Sri Lankan laborers 14 to 46 years of age. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13(5):431–445. [PubMed]
8. Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Karring T. Oral hygiene, gingivitis and periodontal breakdown in adult Tanzanians. J Periodontal Res. 1986;21(3):221–232. [PubMed]
9. Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Manji F. Periodontal diseases in adult Kenyans. J Clin Periodontol. 1988;15(7):445–452. [PubMed]
10. Mealey BL, Rose LF. Diabetes mellitus and inflammatory periodontal diseases. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2008;15(2):135–141. [PubMed]
11. Feller L, Lemmer J. Necrotizing periodontal diseases in HIV-seropositive subjects: pathogenic mechanisms. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2008;10(1):10–15. [PubMed]
12. Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL, Ericson RE, Lau CN, Levanos VA, et al. Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(12):3770–3783. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL., Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol. 1998;25(2):134–144. [PubMed]
14. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Ximenez-Fyvie LA, Feres M, Mager D. Ecological considerations in the treatment of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis periodontal infections. Periodontol 2000. 1999;20:341–362. [PubMed]
15. Beutler B. Innate immune sensing of microbial infection: the mechanism and the therapeutic challenge. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2002;152(2122):547–551. [PubMed]
16. Beutler B, Hoebe K, Du X, Ulevitch RJ. How we detect microbes and respond to them: the Toll-like receptors and their transducers. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;74(4):479–485. [PubMed]
17. van Heel DA, Ghosh S, Hunt KA, Mathew CG, Forbes A, Jewell DP, et al. Synergy between TLR9 and NOD2 innate immune responses is lost in genetic Crohn's disease. Gut. 2005;54(11):1553–1557. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Kullberg BJ, Ferwerda G, de Jong DJ, Drenth JP, Joosten LA, Van der Meer JW, et al. Crohn's disease patients homozygous for the 3020insC NOD2 mutation have a defective NOD2/TLR4 cross-tolerance to intestinal stimuli. Immunology. 2008;123(4):600–605. [PubMed]
19. Baker PJ, Dixon M, Evans RT, Dufour L, Johnson E, Roopenian DC. CD4(+) T cells and the proinflammatory cytokines gamma interferon and interleukin-6 contribute to alveolar bone loss in mice. Infect Immun. 1999;67(6):2804–2809. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Ebersole JL, Taubman MA, Smith DJ, Frey DE, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Human serum antibody responses to oral microorganisms. IV. Correlation with homologous infection. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987;2(2):53–59. [PubMed]
21. Eastcott JW, Yamashita K, Taubman MA, Harada Y, Smith DJ. Adoptive transfer of cloned T helper cells ameliorates periodontal disease in nude rats. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1994;9(5):284–289. [PubMed]
22. Baker PJ, Howe L, Garneau J, Roopenian DC. T cell knockout mice have diminished alveolar bone loss after oral infection with Porphyromonas gingivalis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2002;34(1):45–50. [PubMed]
23. Kawai T, Paster BJ, Komatsuzawa H, Ernst CW, Goncalves RB, Sasaki H, et al. Cross-reactive adaptive immune response to oral commensal bacteria results in an induction of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL)-dependent periodontal bone resorption in a mouse model. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2007;22(3):208–215. [PubMed]
24. Han X, Kawai T, Eastcott JW, Taubman MA. Bacterial-responsive B lymphocytes induce periodontal bone resorption. J Immunol. 2006;176(1):625–631. [PubMed]
25. Kawai T, Matsuyama T, Hosokawa Y, Makihira S, Seki M, Karimbux NY, et al. B and T lymphocytes are the primary sources of RANKL in the bone resorptive lesion of periodontal disease. Am J Pathol. 2006;169(3):987–998. [PubMed]
26. Baker PJ, Evans RT, Roopenian DC. Oral infection with Porphyromonas gingivalis and induced alveolar bone loss in immunocompetent and severe combined immunodeficient mice. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39(12):1035–1040. [PubMed]
27. Baker PJ, Garneau J, Howe L, Roopenian DC. T-cell contributions to alveolar bone loss in response to oral infection with Porphyromonas gingivalis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59(4):222–225. [PubMed]
28. Lemaitre B, Nicolas E, Michaut L, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell. 1996;86(6):973–983. [PubMed]
29. Rossa C, Jr., Liu M, Bronson P, Kirkwood KL. Transcriptional activation of MMP-13 by periodontal pathogenic LPS requires p38 MAP kinase. J Endotoxin Res. 2007;13(2):85–93. [PubMed]
30. Sugawara Y, Uehara A, Fujimoto Y, Kusumoto S, Fukase K, Shibata K, et al. Toll-like receptors, NOD1, and NOD2 in oral epithelial cells. J Dent Res. 2006;85(6):524–529. [PubMed]
31. Ren L, Leung WK, Darveau RP, Jin L. The expression profile of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, membrane-bound CD14, and toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in chronic periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2005;76(11):1950–1959. [PubMed]
32. Kajita K, Honda T, Amanuma R, Domon H, Okui T, Ito H, et al. Quantitative messenger RNA expression of Toll-like receptors and interferon-alpha1 in gingivitis and periodontitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2007;22(6):398–402. [PubMed]
33. Hausmann M, Kiessling S, Mestermann S, Webb G, Spottl T, Andus T, et al. Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 are up-regulated during intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(7):1987–2000. [PubMed]
34. Muthukuru M, Jotwani R, Cutler CW. Oral mucosal endotoxin tolerance induction in chronic periodontitis. Infect Immun. 2005;73(2):687–694. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006;124(4):783–801. [PubMed]
36. Inohara N, Koseki T, del Peso L, Hu Y, Yee C, Chen S, et al. Nod1, an Apaf-1-like activator of caspase-9 and nuclear factor-kappaB. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(21):14560–14567. [PubMed]
37. Ogura Y, Inohara N, Benito A, Chen FF, Yamaoka S, Nunez G. Nod2, a Nod1/Apaf-1 family member that is restricted to monocytes and activates NF-kappaB. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(7):4812–4818. [PubMed]
38. Ishii KJ, Uematsu S, Akira S. ‘Toll’ gates for future immunotherapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12(32):4135–4142. [PubMed]
39. Hemmi H, Kaisho T, Takeuchi O, Sato S, Sanjo H, Hoshino K, et al. Small anti-viral compounds activate immune cells via the TLR7 MyD88-dependent signaling pathway. Nat Immunol. 2002;3(2):196–200. [PubMed]
40. Hoshino K, Kaisho T, Iwabe T, Takeuchi O, Akira S. Differential involvement of IFN-beta in Toll-like receptor-stimulated dendritic cell activation. Int Immunol. 2002;14(10):1225–1231. [PubMed]
41. Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Hoshino K, Kaisho T, Sanjo H, et al. Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science. 2003;301(5633):640–643. [PubMed]
42. Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Uematsu S, Hoshino K, Kaisho T, et al. TRAM is specifically involved in the Toll-like receptor 4-mediated MyD88-independent signaling pathway. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(11):1144–1150. [PubMed]
43. Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Sanjo H, Uematsu S, Kaisho T, et al. Essential role for TIRAP in activation of the signalling cascade shared by TLR2 and TLR4. Nature. 2002;420(6913):324–329. [PubMed]
44. Kawai T, Adachi O, Ogawa T, Takeda K, Akira S. Unresponsiveness of MyD88-deficient mice to endotoxin. Immunity. 1999;11(1):115–122. [PubMed]
45. Kawai T, Takeuchi O, Fujita T, Inoue J, Muhlradt PF, Sato S, et al. Lipopolysaccharide stimulates the MyD88-independent pathway and results in activation of IFN-regulatory factor 3 and the expression of a subset of lipopolysaccharide-inducible genes. J Immunol. 2001;167(10):5887–5894. [PubMed]
46. Tietze K, Dalpke A, Morath S, Mutters R, Heeg K, Nonnenmacher C. Differences in innate immune responses upon stimulation with gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J Periodontal Res. 2006;41(5):447–454. [PubMed]
47. Brozovic S, Sahoo R, Barve S, Shiba H, Uriarte S, Blumberg RS, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis enhances FasL expression via up-regulation of NFkappaB-mediated gene transcription and induces apoptotic cell death in human gingival epithelial cells. Microbiology. 2006;152(Pt 3):797–806. [PubMed]
48. Kikkert R, Laine ML, Aarden LA, van Winkelhoff AJ. Activation of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 by gram-negative periodontal bacteria. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2007;22(3):145–151. [PubMed]
49. Yoshioka H, Yoshimura A, Kaneko T, Golenbock DT, Hara Y. Analysis of the Activity to Induce Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2-and TLR4-Mediated Stimulation of Supragingival Plaque. J Periodontol. 2008;79(5):920–928. [PubMed]
50. Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Tuckova L, Lodinova-Zadnikova R, Stepankova R, Cukrowska B, Funda DP, et al. Mucosal immunity: its role in defense and allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002;128(2):77–89. [PubMed]
51. Shnyra A, Brewington R, Alipio A, Amura C, Morrison DC. Reprogramming of lipopolysaccharide-primed macrophages is controlled by a counterbalanced production of IL-10 and IL-12. J Immunol. 1998;160(8):3729–3736. [PubMed]
52. Abreu MT, Vora P, Faure E, Thomas LS, Arnold ET, Arditi M. Decreased expression of Toll-like receptor-4 and MD-2 correlates with intestinal epithelial cell protection against dysregulated proinflammatory gene expression in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 2001;167(3):1609–1616. [PubMed]
53. Nomura F, Akashi S, Sakao Y, Sato S, Kawai T, Matsumoto M, et al. Cutting edge: endotoxin tolerance in mouse peritoneal macrophages correlates with down-regulation of surface toll-like receptor 4 expression. J Immunol. 2000;164(7):3476–3479. [PubMed]
54. Dobrovolskaia MA, Medvedev AE, Thomas KE, Cuesta N, Toshchakov V, Ren T, et al. Induction of in vitro reprogramming by Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 agonists in murine macrophages: effects of TLR “homotolerance” versus “heterotolerance” on NF-kappa B signaling pathway components. J Immunol. 2003;170(1):508–519. [PubMed]
55. Ii M, Matsunaga N, Hazeki K, Nakamura K, Takashima K, Seya T, et al. A novel cyclohexene derivative, ethyl (6R)-6-[N-(2-Chloro-4-fluorophenyl)sulfamoyl]cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate (TAK-242), selectively inhibits toll-like receptor 4-mediated cytokine production through suppression of intracellular signaling. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69(4):1288–1295. [PubMed]
56. Han J, Lee JD, Bibbs L, Ulevitch RJ. A MAP kinase targeted by endotoxin and hyperosmolarity in mammalian cells. Science. 1994;265(5173):808–811. [PubMed]
57. Li Y, Jiang B, Ensign WY, Vogt PK, Han J. Myogenic differentiation requires signalling through both phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and p38 MAP kinase. Cell Signal. 2000;12(1112):751–757. [PubMed]
58. Hedges JC, Dechert MA, Yamboliev IA, Martin JL, Hickey E, Weber LA, et al. A role for p38(MAPK)/HSP27 pathway in smooth muscle cell migration. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(34):24211–24219. [PubMed]
59. Mbalaviele G, Anderson G, Jones A, De Ciechi P. Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase prevents inflammatory bone destruction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;317(3):1044–1053. [PubMed]
60. Medicherla S, Ma JY, Mangadu R, Jiang Y, Zhao JJ, Almirez R, et al. A selective p38 alpha mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor reverses cartilage and bone destruction in mice with collagen-induced arthritis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;318(1):132–141. [PubMed]
61. Wada Y, Nakajima-Yamada T, Yamada K, Tsuchida J, Yasumoto T, Shimozato T, et al. R-130823, a novel inhibitor of p38 MAPK, ameliorates hyperalgesia and swelling in arthritis models. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;506(3):285–295. [PubMed]
62. Clark JE, Sarafraz N, Marber MS. Potential of p38-MAPK inhibitors in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116(2):192–206. [PubMed]
63. Duan W, Wong WS. Targeting mitogen-activated protein kinases for asthma. Curr Drug Targets. 2006;7(6):691–698. [PubMed]
64. Sasaki Y, Aiba S. Dendritic cells and contact dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2007;33(12):27–34. [PubMed]
65. Mercer BA, D'Armiento JM. Emerging role of MAP kinase pathways as therapeutic targets in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2006;1(2):137–150. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Culbert AA, Skaper SD, Howlett DR, Evans NA, Facci L, Soden PE, et al. MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 deficiency in microglia inhibits pro-inflammatory mediator release and resultant neurotoxicity. Relevance to neuroinflammation in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(33):23658–23667. [PubMed]
67. Rennefahrt U, Janakiraman M, Ollinger R, Troppmair J. Stress kinase signaling in cancer: fact or fiction? Cancer Lett. 2005;217(1):1–9. [PubMed]
68. Patil CS, Kirkwood KL. p38 MAPK signaling in oral-related diseases. J Dent Res. 2007;86(9):812–825. [PubMed]
69. Patil C, Rossa C, Jr., Kirkwood KL. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans lipopolysaccharide induces interleukin-6 expression through multiple mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006;21(6):392–398. [PubMed]
70. Patil C, Zhu X, Rossa C, Jr., Kim YJ, Kirkwood KL. p38 MAPK regulates IL-1beta induced IL-6 expression through mRNA stability in osteoblasts. Immunol Invest. 2004;33(2):213–233. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Rossa C, Jr., Liu M, Patil C, Kirkwood KL. MKK3/6-p38 MAPK negatively regulates murine MMP-13 gene expression induced by IL-1beta and TNF-alpha in immortalized periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Matrix Biol. 2005;24(7):478–488. [PubMed]
72. Rossa C, Ehmann K, Liu M, Patil C, Kirkwood KL. MKK3/6-p38 MAPK signaling is required for IL-1beta and TNF-alpha-induced RANKL expression in bone marrow stromal cells. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2006;26(10):719–729. [PubMed]
73. Ambili R, Santhi WS, Janam P, Nandakumar K, Pillai MR. Expression of activated transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB in periodontally diseased tissues. J Periodontol. 2005;76(7):1148–1153. [PubMed]
74. Matsuki Y, Yamamoto T, Hara K. Detection of inflammatory cytokine messenger RNA (mRNA)-expressing cells in human inflamed gingiva by combined in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Immunology. 1992;76(1):42–47. [PubMed]
75. Yamazaki K, Nakajima T, Gemmell E, Polak B, Seymour GJ, Hara K. IL-4- and IL-6-producing cells in human periodontal disease tissue. J Oral Pathol Med. 1994;23(8):347–353. [PubMed]
76. Tokoro Y, Matsuki Y, Yamamoto T, Suzuki T, Hara K. Relevance of local Th2-type cytokine mRNA expression in immunocompetent infiltrates in inflamed gingival tissue to periodontal diseases. Clin Exp Immunol. 1997;107(1):166–174. [PubMed]
77. Lappin DF, MacLeod CP, Kerr A, Mitchell T, Kinane DF. Anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and T cell cytokine profile in periodontitis granulation tissue. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001;123(2):294–300. [PubMed]
78. Garlet GP, Martins W, Jr., Ferreira BR, Milanezi CM, Silva JS. Patterns of chemokines and chemokine receptors expression in different forms of human periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res. 2003;38(2):210–217. [PubMed]
79. Yamamoto M, Fujihashi K, Hiroi T, McGhee JR, Van Dyke TE, Kiyono H. Molecular and cellular mechanisms for periodontal diseases: role of Th1 and Th2 type cytokines in induction of mucosal inflammation. J Periodontal Res. 1997;32(1 Pt 2):115–119. [PubMed]
80. Seymour GJ, Gemmell E. Cytokines in periodontal disease: where to from here? Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59(3):167–173. [PubMed]
81. Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Microbial etiological agents of destructive periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 1994;5:78–111. [PubMed]
82. Rincon M, Enslen H, Raingeaud J, Recht M, Zapton T, Su M, et al. Interferon-g expression by Th1 effector T cells mediated by the p38 MAP kinase signaling pathway. EMBO J. 1998;17:2817–2829. [PubMed]
83. Zhang ZK, Ma XC, Gao S, Gu ZY, Fu KY. Studies on contributing factors in temporomandibular disorders. Chin J Dent Res. 1999;2(34):7–20. [PubMed]
84. Cook R, Wu CC, Kang YJ, Han J. The role of the p38 pathway in adaptive immunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2007;4(4):253–259. [PubMed]
85. Craxton A, Shu G, Graves J, Saklatvala J, Krebs E, Clark E. p38 MAPK is required for CD40-induced gene expression and proliferation in B lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1998;161:3225–3226. [PubMed]
86. Dadgostar H, Zarnegar B, Hoffmann A, Qin XF, Truong U, Rao G, et al. Cooperation of multiple signaling pathways in CD40-regulated gene expression in B lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(3):1497–1502. [PubMed]
87. Pesu M, Aittomaki S, Takaluoma K, Lagerstedt A, Silvennoinen O. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase regulates interleukin-4-induced gene expression by stimulating STAT6-mediated transcription. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(41):38254–38261. [PubMed]
88. Fung E, Tang SM, Canner JP, Morishige K, Arboleda-Velasquez JF, Cardoso AA, et al. Delta-like 4 induces notch signaling in macrophages: implications for inflammation. Circulation. 2007;115(23):2948–2956. [PubMed]
89. Ando K, Kanazawa S, Tetsuka T, Ohta S, Jiang X, Tada T, et al. Induction of Notch signaling by tumor necrosis factor in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2003;22(49):7796–7803. [PubMed]
90. Gordon MD, Nusse R. Wnt signaling: multiple pathways, multiple receptors, and multiple transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(32):22429–22433. [PubMed]
91. Pereira C, Schaer DJ, Bachli EB, Kurrer MO, Schoedon G. Wnt5A/CaMKII signaling contributes to the inflammatory response of macrophages and is a target for the antiinflammatory action of activated protein C and interleukin-10. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28(3):504–510. [PubMed]
92. Williams DL, Ozment-Skelton T, Li C. Modulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathway alters host response to sepsis, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Shock. 2006;25(5):432–439. [PubMed]
93. Rommel C, Camps M, Ji H. PI3K delta and PI3K gamma: partners in crime in inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis and beyond? Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(3):191–201. [PubMed]
94. Bickel M, Axtelius B, Solioz C, Attstrom R. Cytokine gene expression in chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28(9):840–847. [PubMed]
95. Holtmann H, Winzen R, Holland P, Eickemeier S, Hoffmann E, Wallach D, et al. Induction of interleukin-8 synthesis integrates effects on transcription and mRNA degradation from at least three different cytokine- or stress-activated signal transduction pathways. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(10):6742–6753. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
96. Kotlyarov A, Neininger A, Schubert C, Eckert R, Birchmeier C, Volk HD, et al. MAPKAP kinase 2 is essential for LPS-induced TNF-alpha biosynthesis. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1(2):94–97. [PubMed]
97. Winzen R, Kracht M, Ritter B, Wilhelm A, Chen CY, Shyu AB, et al. The p38 MAP kinase pathway signals for cytokine-induced mRNA stabilization via MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2 and an AU-rich region-targeted mechanism. Embo J. 1999;18(18):4969–4980. [PubMed]
98. Ridley SH, Dean JL, Sarsfield SJ, Brook M, Clark AR, Saklatvala J. A p38 MAP kinase inhibitor regulates stability of interleukin-1-induced cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA. FEBS Lett. 1998;439(12):75–80. [PubMed]
99. Lasa M, Mahtani KR, Finch A, Brewer G, Saklatvala J, Clark AR. Regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 mRNA stability by the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 signaling cascade. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(12):4265–4274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
100. Stoecklin G, Stoeckle P, Lu M, Muehlemann O, Moroni C. Cellular mutants define a common mRNA degradation pathway targeting cytokine AU-rich elements. Rna. 2001;7(11):1578–1588. [PubMed]
101. Enslen H, Raingeaud J, Davis RJ. Selective activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase isoforms by the MAP kinase kinases MKK3 and MKK6. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(3):1741–1748. [PubMed]
102. Heidenreich O, Neininger A, Schratt G, Zinck R, Cahill MA, Engel K, et al. MAPKAP kinase 2 phosphorylates serum response factor in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(20):14434–14443. [PubMed]
103. Kotlyarov A, Gaestel M. Is MK2 (mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2) the key for understanding post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression? Biochem Soc Trans. 2002;30(Pt 6):959–963. [PubMed]
104. Ajizian SJ, English BK, Meals EA. Specific inhibitors of p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways block inducible nitric oxide synthase and tumor necrosis factor accumulation in murine macrophages stimulated with lipopolysaccharide and interferon-gamma. J Infect Dis. 1999;179(4):939–944. [PubMed]
105. Dean JL, Brook M, Clark AR, Saklatvala J. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase regulates cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA stability and transcription in lipopolysaccharide-treated human monocytes. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(1):264–269. [PubMed]
106. Ridley SH, Sarsfield SJ, Lee JC, Bigg HF, Cawston TE, Taylor DJ, et al. Actions of IL-1 are selectively controlled by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase: regulation of prostaglandin H synthase-2, metalloproteinases, and IL-6 at different levels. J Immunol. 1997;158(7):3165–3173. [PubMed]
107. Underwood DC, Osborn RR, Bochnowicz S, Webb EF, Rieman DJ, Lee JC, et al. SB 239063, a p38 MAPK inhibitor, reduces neutrophilia, inflammatory cytokines, MMP-9, and fibrosis in lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000;279(5):L895–902. [PubMed]
108. Gutierrez-Venegas G, Maldonado-Frias S, Ontiveros-Granados A, Kawasaki-Cardenas P. Role of p38 in nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase expression, and nitric oxide and PGE2 synthesis in human gingival fibroblasts stimulated with lipopolysaccharides. Life Sci. 2005;77(1):60–73. [PubMed]
109. Johnson GL, Dohlman HG, Graves LM. MAPK kinase kinases (MKKKs) as a target class for small-molecule inhibition to modulate signaling networks and gene expression. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2005;9(3):325–331. [PubMed]
110. Schindler JF, Monahan JB, Smith WG. p38 pathway kinases as anti-inflammatory drug targets. J Dent Res. 2007;86(9):800–811. [PubMed]
111. Avruch J. MAP kinase pathways: the first twenty years. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773(8):1150–1160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
112. Zhao W, Liu M, Kirkwood KL. p38alpha stabilizes interleukin-6 mRNA via multiple AU-rich elements. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(4):1778–1785. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
113. Raingeaud J, Gupta S, Rogers JS, Dickens M, Han J, Ulevitch RJ, et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and environmental stress cause p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by dual phosphorylation on tyrosine and threonine. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(13):7420–7426. [PubMed]
114. Hazzalin CA, Cano E, Cuenda A, Barratt MJ, Cohen P, Mahadevan LC. p38/RK is essential for stress-induced nuclear responses: JNK/SAPKs and c-Jun/ATF-2 phosphorylation are insufficient. Curr Biol. 1996;6(8):1028–1031. [PubMed]
115. Whitmarsh AJ, Yang SH, Su MS, Sharrocks AD, Davis RJ. Role of p38 and JNK mitogen-activated protein kinases in the activation of ternary complex factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(5):2360–2371. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Huang C, Ma WY, Maxiner A, Sun Y, Dong Z. p38 kinase mediates UV-induced phosphorylation of p53 protein at serine 389. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(18):12229–12235. [PubMed]
117. Engelman JA, Lisanti MP, Scherer PE. Specific inhibitors of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase block 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(48):32111–32120. [PubMed]
118. Kovarik P, Stoiber D, Eyers PA, Menghini R, Neininger A, Gaestel M, et al. Stress-induced phosphorylation of STAT1 at Ser727 requires p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase whereas IFN-gamma uses a different signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(24):13956–13961. [PubMed]
119. Raingeaud J, Whitmarsh AJ, Barrett T, Derijard B, Davis RJ. MKK3- and MKK6-regulated gene expression is mediated by the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(3):1247–1255. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
120. Mikkola I, Bruun JA, Bjorkoy G, Holm T, Johansen T. Phosphorylation of the transactivation domain of Pax6 by extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(21):15115–15126. [PubMed]
121. Rouse J, Cohen P, Trigon S, Morange M, Alonso-Llamazares A, Zamanillo D, et al. A novel kinase cascade triggered by stress and heat shock that stimulates MAPKAP kinase-2 and phosphorylation of the small heat shock proteins. Cell. 1994;78(6):1027–1037. [PubMed]
122. McLaughlin MM, Kumar S, McDonnell PC, Van Horn S, Lee JC, Livi GP, et al. Identification of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase-activated protein kinase-3, a novel substrate of CSBP p38 MAP kinase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(14):8488–8492. [PubMed]
123. Waskiewicz AJ, Flynn A, Proud CG, Cooper JA. Mitogen-activated protein kinases activate the serine/threonine kinases Mnk1 and Mnk2. Embo J. 1997;16(8):1909–1920. [PubMed]
124. Deak M, Clifton AD, Lucocq LM, Alessi DR. Mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1 (MSK1) is directly activated by MAPK and SAPK2/p38, and may mediate activation of CREB. Embo J. 1998;17(15):4426–4441. [PubMed]
125. New L, Jiang Y, Zhao M, Liu K, Zhu W, Flood LJ, et al. PRAK, a novel protein kinase regulated by the p38 MAP kinase. Embo J. 1998;17(12):3372–3384. [PubMed]
126. Kramer RM, Roberts EF, Um SL, Borsch-Haubold AG, Watson SP, Fisher MJ, et al. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylates cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) in thrombin-stimulated platelets. Evidence that proline-directed phosphorylation is not required for mobilization of arachidonic acid by cPLA2. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(44):27723–27729. [PubMed]
127. Zwang Y, Yarden Y. p38 MAP kinase mediates stress-induced internalization of EGFR: implications for cancer chemotherapy. Embo J. 2006;25(18):4195–4206. [PubMed]
128. Farley N, Pedraza-Alva G, Serrano-Gomez D, Nagaleekar V, Aronshtam A, Krahl T, et al. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase mediates the Fas-induced mitochondrial death pathway in CD8+ T cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(6):2118–2129. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
129. Mahtani KR, Brook M, Dean JL, Sully G, Saklatvala J, Clark AR. Mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 controls the expression and posttranslational modification of tristetraprolin, a regulator of tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA stability. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(19):6461–6469. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
130. Carballo E, Cao H, Lai WS, Kennington EA, Campbell D, Blackshear PJ. Decreased sensitivity of tristetraprolin-deficient cells to p38 inhibitors suggests the involvement of tristetraprolin in the p38 signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(45):42580–42587. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
131. Brook M, Tchen CR, Santalucia T, McIlrath J, Arthur JS, Saklatvala J, et al. Posttranslational regulation of tristetraprolin subcellular localization and protein stability by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathways. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(6):2408–2418. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
132. Efimova T, Deucher A, Kuroki T, Ohba M, Eckert RL. Novel protein kinase C isoforms regulate human keratinocyte differentiation by activating a p38 delta mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade that targets CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(35):31753–31760. [PubMed]
133. Sabio G, Arthur JS, Kuma Y, Peggie M, Carr J, Murray-Tait V, et al. p38gamma regulates the localisation of SAP97 in the cytoskeleton by modulating its interaction with GKAP. Embo J. 2005;24(6):1134–1145. [PubMed]
134. Christersson LA, Zambon JJ. Suppression of subgingival Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in localized juvenile periodontitis by systemic tetracycline. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20(6):395–401. [PubMed]
135. Williams RC, Jeffcoat MK, Howell TH, Rolla A, Stubbs D, Teoh KW, et al. Altering the progression of human alveolar bone loss with the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug flurbiprofen. J Periodontol. 1989;60(9):485–490. [PubMed]
136. Jeffcoat MK, Williams RC, Reddy MS, English R, Goldhaber P. Flurbiprofen treatment of human periodontitis: effect on alveolar bone height and metabolism. J Periodontal Res. 1988;23(6):381–385. [PubMed]
137. Williams RC, Jeffcoat MK, Howell TH, Reddy MS, Johnson HG, Hall CM, et al. Ibuprofen: an inhibitor of alveolar bone resorption in beagles. J Periodontal Res. 1988;23(4):225–229. [PubMed]
138. Caton JG, Ciancio SG, Blieden TM, Bradshaw M, Crout RJ, Hefti AF, et al. Treatment with subantimicrobial dose doxycycline improves the efficacy of scaling and root planing in patients with adult periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2000;71(4):521–532. [PubMed]
139. Ciancio S, Ashley R. Safety and efficacy of sub-antimicrobial-dose doxycycline therapy in patients with adult periodontitis. Adv Dent Res. 1998;12(2):27–31. [PubMed]
140. Reddy MS, Weatherford TW, 3rd, Smith CA, West BD, Jeffcoat MK, Jacks TM. Alendronate treatment of naturally-occurring periodontitis in beagle dogs. J Periodontol. 1995;66(3):211–217. [PubMed]
141. Rocha M, Nava LE, Vazquez de la Torre C, Sanchez-Marin F, Garay-Sevilla ME, Malacara JM. Clinical and radiological improvement of periodontal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with alendronate: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2001;72(2):204–209. [PubMed]
142. Niikura K. Vacuolar ATPase as a drug discovery target. Drug News Perspect. 2006;19(3):139–144. [PubMed]
143. Lee HJ, Kang IK, Chung CP, Choi SM. The subgingival microflora and gingival crevicular fluid cytokines in refractory periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(11):885–890. [PubMed]
144. Assuma R, Oates T, Cochran D, Amar S, Graves DT. IL-1 and TNF antagonists inhibit the inflammatory response and bone loss in experimental periodontitis. J Immunol. 1998;160(1):403–409. [PubMed]
145. Graves DT, Delima AJ, Assuma R, Amar S, Oates T, Cochran D. Interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor antagonists inhibit the progression of inflammatory cell infiltration toward alveolar bone in experimental periodontitis. J Periodontol. 1998;69(12):1419–1425. [PubMed]
146. Schaeffer V, Cuschieri J, Garcia I, Maier R. The priming effect of c5a on monocytes is predominantly mediated by the p38 MAPK pathway. Shock. 2007;27(6):623–630. [PubMed]
147. Towns M, Bathon J. Inhibition of interleukin-1 as a strategy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. 2007. http://www.hopkins-arthritis.som.jhmi.edu/rheumatoid/il1.html 28 April 2007.
148. Zwerina J, Hayer S, Tohidast-Akrad M, Bergmeister H, Redlich K, Feige U, et al. Single and combined inhibition of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1, and RANKL pathways in tumor necrosis factor-induced arthritis: effects on synovial inflammation, bone erosion, and cartilage destruction. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(1):277–290. [PubMed]
149. Parasrampuria DA, de Boer P, Desai-Krieger D, Chow AT, Jones CR. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of RWJ 67657, a specific p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor: a first-in-human study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;43(4):406–413. [PubMed]
150. Kirkwood K, Li F, Rogers J, Otremba J, Coatney D, Kreider J, et al. A p38 alpha selective mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor prevents periodontal bone loss. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;320(1):56–63. [PubMed]
151. Fu Q, Jilka R, Manolagas S, O'Brien C. Parathyroid hormone stimulates receptor activator of NFkappa B ligand and inhibits osteoprotegerin expression via protein kinase A activation of cAMP-response element-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:48868–48875. [PubMed]
152. Hamilton C. Infectious complications of treatment with biologic agents. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16:393–398. [PubMed]
153. Furst D, Schiff M, RM F. Adalimumab, a fully human anti tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody, and concomitant standard antirheumatic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: results of STAR (Safety Trial of Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis). J Rheumatol. 2003;30:2563–2571. [PubMed]
154. Merritt C, Enslen H, Diehl N, Conze, Davis, Rincon M. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in vivo selectively induces apoptosis of CD8+ but not CD4+ T cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:936–946. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
155. Lu H, Yang D, Wysk M, Gatti E, Mellman I, Davis R, et al. Defective IL-12 production in mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase 3 (Mkk3)-deficient mice. EMBO J. 1999;18:1845–1857. [PubMed]
156. Goedert M, Cuenda A, Craxton M, Jakes R, Cohen P. Activation of the novel stress-activated protein kinase SAPK4 by cytokines and cellular stresses is mediated by SKK3 (MKK6); comparison of its substrate specificity with that of other SAP kinases. EMBO J. 1997;16(12):3563–3571. [PubMed]
157. Davies S, Reddy H, Caivano M, Cohen P. Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochem J. 2000;351(pt 1):95–105. [PubMed]
158. Alonso G, Ambrosino C, Jones M, Nebreda A. Differential activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase isoforms depending on signal strength. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(51):40641–40648. [PubMed]
159. Wang XS, Diener K, Manthey CL, Wang S, Rosenzweig B, Bray J, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(38):23668–23674. [PubMed]
160. Wang Y, Huang S, Sah VP, Ross J, Jr., Brown JH, Han J, et al. Cardiac muscle cell hypertrophy and apoptosis induced by distinct members of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase family. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(4):2161–2168. [PubMed]
161. Sweitzer S, Medicherla S, Almirez R, Dugar S, Chakravarty S, Shumilla J, et al. Antinociceptive action of a p38 alpha MAPK inhibitor, SD-282, in a diabetic neuropathy model. Pain. 2004;109(3):409–419. [PubMed]
162. Kirkwood KL, Li F, Rogers JE, Otremba J, Coatney DD, Kreider JM, et al. A p38alpha selective mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor prevents periodontal bone loss. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;320(1):56–63. [PubMed]
163. Ding C. Drug evaluation: VX-702, a MAP kinase inhibitor for rheumatoid arthritis and acute coronary syndrome. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2006;7(11):1020–1025. [PubMed]
164. Lee M, Dominguez C. MAP kinase p38 inhibitors: clinical results and an intimate look at their interactions with p38 alpha protein. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12:2979–2994. [PubMed]
165. Brum L.a.M.P. Vertex Moves to Re-allocate Resources from VX-745 in p38 MAP Kinase Program to Accelerate Development of Second Generation Drug Candidates VX-702 and VX-850. 2001. [cited; Available from: http://www.vrtx.com/Pressreleases2001/ pr092401.html.
166. Schreiber S, Feagan B, D'Haens G, Colombel J, Geboes K, Yurcov M, et al. Oral p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibition with BIRB 796 for active Crohn's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(3):325–334. [PubMed]
167. Zhang J, Shen B, Lin A. Novel strategies for inhibition of the p38 MAPK pathway. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007;28(6):286–295. [PubMed]
168. Kyriakis JM, Avruch J. Mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(2):807–869. [PubMed]
169. Noble ME, Endicott JA, Johnson LN. Protein kinase inhibitors: insights into drug design from structure. Science. 2004;303(5665):1800–1805. [PubMed]
170. Barnes PJ, Stockley RA. COPD: current therapeutic interventions and future approaches. Eur Respir J. 2005;25(6):1084–1106. [PubMed]
171. Patil C, Kirkwood K. p38 MAPK signaling mechanisms in inflammatory dental diseases. Crit Rev Oral Biol. 2007 In press.
172. Greenwald RA, Kirkwood K. Adult periodontitis as a model for rheumatoid arthritis (with emphasis on treatment strategies). J Rheumatol. 1999;26(8):1650–1653. [PubMed]
173. Kirkwood KL, Cirelli JA, Rogers JE, Giannobile WV. Novel host response therapeutic approaches to treat periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2007;43:294–315. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
174. Mercado FB, Marshall RI, Bartold PM. Inter-relationships between rheumatoid arthritis and periodontal disease. A review. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(9):761–772. [PubMed]
175. Ejeil AL, Gaultier F, Igondjo-Tchen S, Senni K, Pellat B, Godeau G, et al. Are cytokines linked to collagen breakdown during periodontal disease progression? J Periodontol. 2003;74(2):196–201. [PubMed]
176. Stashenko P, Jandinski JJ, Fujiyoshi P, Rynar J, Socransky SS. Tissue levels of bone resorptive cytokines in periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 1991;62(8):504–509. [PubMed]
177. Graves DT. The potential role of chemokines and inflammatory cytokines in periodontal disease progression. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28(3):482–490. [PubMed]