University at Buffalo - The State University of New York
Skip to Content
PubMed Central, Fig. 1. : Microbiology. 2011 Nov; 157(Pt 11): 3195–3202. doi:  10.1099/mic.0.052498-0
Logo of micLink to Publisher's site
PMC full text:

Fig. 1.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 052498-f1.jpg

Growth of T. forsythia biofilm on glycoprotein surfaces. (a) Biofilm growth was assessed for the wild-type strain in the absence (black bars) or presence of oseltamivir (grey bars). Biofilms were set up in triplicate and wells were supplemented with 6 mM sialic acid (sialic) or 6 mM sialyl-lactose (sia-lac), or coated with 6 mM mucin, fetuin and asialofetuin (as-fet), 2 µg human serum ml−1 (serum) or saliva, with and without the addition of 10 mM oseltamivir to the TSB medium, as indicated at the time of inoculation. Glycoproteins were coated on the 96-well plate overnight at 4 °C and washed before inoculation with T. forsythia to a final OD600 of 0.05. Data are the mean number of cells with sds after harvesting from wells after 5 days. Differences between mean values in this experiment were evaluated by t test, with P<0.05 being taken as the level of significance (*statistically significant). (b) Biofilm growth was compared as above between the wild-type (wt) strain and the ΔnanH mutant strain of T. forsythia (ΔnanH).

Images in this article

  • Fig. 1.
  • Fig. 2.
  • Fig. 3.
  • Fig. 4.
  • Fig. 5.
Click on the image to see a larger version.