University at Buffalo - The State University of New York
Skip to Content
Clinical evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems in noncarious cervical lesions: a two-year report. - PubMed - NCBI
Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Oper Dent. 2013 Sep-Oct;38(5):477-87. doi: 10.2341/12-355-CR. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

Clinical evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems in noncarious cervical lesions: a two-year report.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical performance of two self-etch dental adhesives with Single Bond Plus, a traditional one-bottle total-etch dental adhesive, for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A total of 156 restorations were placed in noncarious cervical lesions with a minimum depth of 1.5 mm. Patients had no chronic periodontal disease and had normal salivary function. Each patient received restorations on three teeth, each bonded with either Adper Single Bond Plus, Adper Easy Bond, or Adper Scotchbond SE dental adhesive. All lesions were restored with Filtek Supreme Plus composite resin. All teeth were isolated with a rubber dam, received a short enamel bevel, and were cleaned with flour of pumice. The adhesives and resin composite were applied following the manufacturers' instructions. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, six months, one year, and two years using modified US Public Health Service criteria.

RESULTS:

Two-year retention was recorded as 97.3%, 90.5%, and 95.2%, for Single Bond Plus, Scotchbond SE, and Easy Bond, respectively. Statistical analysis did not show a significant difference (p>0.05) in clinical performance between any of the three adhesives after a period of two years.

PMID:
23327229
DOI:
10.2341/12-355-CR
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Allen Press, Inc.
    Loading ...
    Support Center